How nuclear energy and data centers help Colorado businesses, and Coloradans, win. The states that solve power will attract the next generation of employers. The states that don't will watch them leave.
After a decade of flat demand, U.S. electricity consumption is surging. Data centers, EVs, reshoring, and building electrification are colliding with a grid that can't grow fast enough. The result is a looming national emergency.
Estimated annual demand growth contribution by sector
In 2025, China added 540 GW of new power capacity. The US added 53 GW, a record for America, but less than one-tenth of China's buildout. This isn't just an energy gap. It's a strategic one.
Colorado's clean energy mandates are closing coal plants and mines across the state. At least 11 communities across 9 counties are directly impacted, losing not just jobs but tax base, school funding, and economic identity.
When a community loses its economic anchor without an equivalent replacement, the consequences follow a predictable and devastating pattern. This is not speculation, it is documented across every coal community that has been through it.
Colorado's coal communities already have what nuclear developers need most: transmission infrastructure, land, water access, and a skilled energy workforce. The 2025 law adding nuclear to Colorado's clean energy definition was step one. Now comes execution.
| Community / Site | Facility | Transmission | Water | Workforce | Community | Overall | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pueblo (Comanche) | 1,410 MW coal site, Xcel-owned | Very High | 1 |
||||
| Craig (Craig Station) | 1,285 MW coal site, Tri-State | High | 2 |
||||
| Colorado Springs (Nixon) | 207 MW coal site, municipal utility | Mod-High | 3 |
||||
| Hayden (Hayden Station) | 233 MW coal site, Xcel | Moderate | 4 |
||||
| Brush / Fort Morgan (Pawnee) | 505 MW, converting to gas | Low-Mod | 5 |
Nuclear plants pay more, last longer, and create deeper economic roots
In the first four months of 2026 alone, 75+ data center projects worth $130 billion were successfully blocked nationwide. The demand is real and growing, but it has nowhere to go. Colorado can be the place it goes, or watch Wyoming and Utah take it.
9.8+ GW of nuclear capacity has been committed to data centers across 13 announced projects
Done right, this isn't a giveaway to industry. It's how Colorado keeps its employers, protects its ratepayers, saves its coal towns, and claims a durable identity as the national leader in energy, data, and AI.
The legislative framework is taking shape. HB25-1040 made nuclear clean energy. HB26-1337 launches site identification. The question is whether Colorado moves fast enough to capture the opportunity, or lets it cross the border to Wyoming.
A legislator's first question is "what does this cost us?" Pretending there are no risks would be dishonest. Here are the real ones, and the real solutions.
Companies go where the power and the capacity are. We can be that place.